premiersiteservices1 wrote

Premier Sit Services provides the support and resources you need to combat these diseases, conditions, and addictions. We understand that it can be difficult to bear the burden of your situation without help, so we are here for you.

Nick Tuono wrote

I don't think any rational sentient being would suggest for a minute that anyone with a mental illness that suffers self harm injuries shouldn't be treated and cared for by society.

Elizabeth Harper wrote

Is it being suggested that the neurodiverse and mentally ill should be denied care for injuries or self-harm they experience due to their neurochemical/ mental health issues? That seems very wrong to me.

Elizabeth Harper wrote

What are these self-inflicted diseases you are referring to? How prevalent are self-inflicted diseases? Are addictions, cancers, broken bones from falls considered self-inflicted? They shouldn't be. Question is ableist in its assumptions.

Carmelo wrote

To say its incumbent on the individual may be narrow-minded in thinking. Yes we are responsible to look after ourselves and our loved ones. In some cases, mental health, income or personal circumstances may make that challenging.

Moses Jackson wrote

Well said JB. Agreed.

Jb wrote

Not at the expense of those suffering from illness and injury that were not self-inflicted. The big challenge is defining what is or is not self-inflicted.

Brad Davidson wrote

Controversial, as an addiction is also a disease. Drug companies are the greediest of sorts. But that is another issue.

JHR BOB wrote

of this debilitating disease, why would it be appropriate to pay for someone who has self inflicted diseases or addictions?

JHR BOB wrote

If Melissa Verleg cannot get the Government to help her pay for her costly Cystic Fibrosis medication to help reduce the effects (con't)