Image

Upload Image

Confirm Image Creation

Category:

Categorize your audio

Select a post type

Recommend a Audio

Recommend a Book

Recommend a Movie

What's the story?

Category:

Or upload your own photo instead!

Category:

Create Poll

Choose a category

Confirm Poll Creation

Category:

Create Event Description

Create Event Details

Choose an event image
select one

Choose event category

Create event confirmation

Mar 26, 2025

Mar 26, 2025

Category:

YouTube Post

Give us a little more information

YouTube Post Confirmation

Category:

Create your account
and start contributing today.


Categorize your audio

What's the story?

Category:

Or upload your own photo instead!

Review your

Category:

Create Poll

Choose a category

Confirm Poll Creation

Category:

Create Event Description

Create Event Details

Choose an event image
select one

Choose event category

Create event confirmation

Category:

YouTube Post

Give us a little more information

YouTube Post Confirmation

Category:

Image

Upload Image

Confirm Image Creation

Category:

Recommend a Book

Recommend a Quote

Recommend a Film

Recommend an Image

Recommend YouTube Video

Contributions

You have no posts

We reward new content.

START POST

Whoo Knew

No replies

Share your opinion on topics.

CONVERSATIONS

Contests

No entries

Win gift cards and more.

Your Profile

FOLLOWERS

Users

POINTS EARNED

REDEEM

Happiness Tuesdays

Politics & Governance

Should Rules Have Consequences When Broken?

Do you believe that rules should have corresponding consequences when they are broken?

I believe that rules are the backbone of a functioning society, organization, or community. They provide structure, they ensure fairness and they promote safety.

But we all know that rules get broken from time to time..so should there be consequences when this happens? I believe there should be because otherwise things just become a free-for-all and chaos ensues.

The consequences for breaking rules serve a clear purpose - to reinforce the importance of the rules themselves. I believe that the rules should exist for a clear purpose, and they need to have a reason for existing. Side note: as a parent, I understand that the reason for the rule isn’t always clear to all parties, but there should still be a rational reason.

If there are no consequences the rules quickly lose their weight and become more like suggestions than standards.

Think about it - if there are no consequences then everything falls apart. For example, in a workplace there are usually deadlines.  But if those deadlines are ignored without any penalty or consequences, why would anyone stick to the deadline? Things would fall apart quickly.

Consequences also uphold fairness. Let’s continue with the example of deadlines in a workplace. If one employee continually blows their deadlines and another constantly gets their work done on time, then there is no equity and the person who is following the rules gets undermined. This creates resentment because one person’s effort goes unrewarded and another person’s noncompliance goes unchecked. 

Having consequences for not following the rules (and following them consistently) creates a playing field where everyone is held to the same standard.

All this being said, the nature of the consequence matters. The consequence should match the rule - it shouldn’t be so extreme that it doesn’t fit. It also shouldn’t be so light that it doesn’t hold any weight. It often works well when repeated violations call for stricter measures. If you keep breaking the same rule, the consequences get harder and harder.

The last thing to consider is applying grace. This should not be used as an excuse not to enforce a consequence, but it’s always worth looking at every situation because they always have different circumstances. Don’t be so rigid that you won’t even hear someone out.

What do you think? Are consequences necessary when people break rules?

Quote of the day

“I love rules and I love following them, unless that rule is stupid.” ― Anna Kendrick

Article of the day - The Consequences of Following Rules

I’ve been thinking a lot lately about the consequences of following rules (and its complement, innovation).

Everywhere you look there are rules and regulations written in BOLD.

NO TRESPASSING

PARKED CARS WILL BE TICKETED

KEEP REFRIGERATED

USE BY 04/28/2022

But what happens when one breaks the rules? Are the penalties severe and immediate, or are they mild and under-enforced? Is there some level of cost/benefit analysis that can be applied to petty shenaniganry?

My partner seems to innately understand that there is more elbow room in the system than advertised. She ignores Use By dates and refrigeration warnings at will. Yesterday’s yogurt! Room-temperature salad dressing! Eggs on the counter!

Eggs on the counter!

I’ve been on a quest the last few years to break more rules. It’s like waking up in the post-simulation goo of the Matrix, messy and enlightening at the same time.

First I started paying for parking selectively. Not because I’m a jerk (at least, I don’t think so) who wants to game the system. Rather, I realized that my anxiety about parking (running out of time! Running back to feed the meter!) was taking up a lot of my energy — without my having any sense of how likely a parking enforcement action actually was.

And now I’ve gathered some data. And I mostly pay for parking. But, when my spot expires and I’ll be back at the car in fifteen minutes, I don’t sweat it. I’ve paid fines a couple of times – and that’s been OK.

In business, I think we’re often bound by our beliefs about our systems rather than the reality of a system itself. These rules are more implicit than a sign demanding (requesting?) that you pay for parking.

For example, many participants in the legal ecosystem use an hourly billing model which creates a lot of perverse side effects (like the incentive to do things inefficiently). They’re operating in a local maximum — while they may be maximizing billings, they are missing the opportunity to climb a bigger mountain and transform the way their firm or practice works.

Mostly, I suspect, this is because it feels quite comfortable to do things in the usual way. Shifting a practice like this is hard because it requires a willingness to take risks and deal with the consequences of being wrong.

If that feels scary to you, I have three suggestions.

 

  1. Start small. Leave some eggs on the counter overnight and see what happens. Stop paying for parking and see what the fines are like. It may sound silly, but I think the “muscle” is the same in both cases.
  2. Acknowledge that expanding your boundaries is, in fact, scary. Try to figure out why. What’s the story you’re telling yourself? Does trying something like this feel like it exposes you to catastrophic failure?
  3. Work with someone who can support you. This is what I do in my consulting and coaching practice, guide leaders who are transforming the way their teams, companies, and even their whole industries work.

If you’re leading change, you’re doing tough work and you deserve someone in your corner.

What about you? Where might you be stuck inside the Matrix? What rules can you break to test how deep the rabbit hole goes?

Question of the day - Do you think that consequences are necessary when people break rules?

Politics & Governance

Do you think that consequences are necessary when people break rules?

0/240

Subscribe to our newsletter

Current Survey

How many very close friends do you currently have in your life?
Submit

How many very close friends do you currently have in your life?